Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01630
Original file (PD2012 01630.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME:    BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army
CASE NUMBER: PD1201630   SEPARATION DATE: 20031106
BOARD DATE: 20130416


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (74B/Information Systems) medically separated for bilateral tibial/knee and lumbar spine conditions. He experienced an onset of bilateral anterior tibial pain, bilateral knee pain and low back pain (LBP) during his first physical fitness test in basic training in 1996. The knee pain was diagnosed as patellofemoral syndrome (PFS); the tibial pain as shin splints, and the back pain as degenerative disc disease (DDD). In 1999, the CI was found fit for duty by the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). In 2003, a Military Occupational Specialty (MOS)/Medical Retention Board (MMRB) referred the CI back to the Disability Evaluation System (DES). Despite profile restrictions and a further trial of conservative management, none of the conditions could be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his MOS or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent U3/L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded “bilateral tibial pain without stress fracture”, “bilateral anterior knee pain” and “low back pain without radiculopathy” for PEB adjudication IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted. The PEB adjudicated the bilateral tibia/knee pain as a single unfitting condition, rated 10%, referencing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy; and adjudicated the low back condition as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria in the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The PEB also specifically referenced Army Regulation (AR) 635-40 and Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39 in its decision. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 20% combined disability rating.
CI CONTENTION: “Department of Veteran’s Affairs determined my initial percentage at 40%. This was a total percentage based on DDD L5-S1, bilateral knee pain, shoulder bursitis in both shoulders and neck pain. All listed injuries were determined to be service connected.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB, when specifically requested by the CI. The ratings for the unfitting knee/tibial and lumbar conditions are addressed below. The shoulder and neck conditions specified in the application were not identified by the MEB/PEB, and thus are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Those, and any other conditions or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the respective Army Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20030812
 VA (1 Mo. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Bilateral Tibia and Anterior Knee Pain 5099-5003 10% PFS, Left Knee 5024-5260 10% 20031208
PFS, Right Knee 5024-5260 10% 20031208
Chronic Low Back Pain 5299-5295 10% DDD, Lumbosacral Spine 5242 10% 20031208
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 3 10% 20031208
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 40%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 200 40227 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s contention that suggests ratings should have been conferred for other conditions present at the time of separation. The Board wishes to clarify that it is subject to the same laws for service disability entitlements as those under which the DES operates. While the DES considers all of the member's medical conditions, compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions that cut short a member’s career and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of final disposition. However the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws (Title 38, United States Code), is empowered to compensate all service-connected conditions and to periodically reevaluate said conditions for the purpose of adjusting the veteran’s disability rating should the degree of impairment vary over time.

Bilateral Tibia/Knee Pain Condition(s): The CI experienced bilateral tibia pain and bilateral anterior knee pain concurrently during basic training in 1996. There was no injury noted. He was treated with physical therapy (PT) and anti-inflammatories, and carried on temporary profiles. An October 1996 bone scan was consistent with mild bilateral shin splints (periostitis without cortical stress fractures), and repeat scanning (7 months later) showed worsening periostitis (still without cortical fractures). The CI continued with aggressive PT and further trial of conservative management for another year without success. Review of the service treatment record (STR) revealed that the CI’s bilateral tibial and knee pain was profiled and more problematic during the period between 1996 and 1997. After 1997, the CI had one visit for bilateral knee pain (March 1999) after a 2½ mile walk. He was referred to the MMRB in 1998, and found fit by a PEB in June 1999 (see summary). Another MMRB was convened in October 2001 which retained the CI in his current MOS, finding that “your permanent medical condition does not impede the satisfactory performance of your MOS in a worldwide field environment.” The CI wrote a letter rebutting the findings of that MMRB and requested his case be referred to the DES. For the subsequent 2+ year period leading up to separation, there was no STR evidence of a medical visit for management of the CI’s bilateral tibia/knee pain.

The goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in this chart:
Knee ROM
 MEB /Ortho 4 Mo s . Pre-Sep VA C&P 1 Mo. Post-Sep
Left Right Left Right
Flexion (140 ° Normal)
 130 ° 130 ° 130 ° 130 °
Extension (0 ° Normal)
 0 ° 0 ° 0 ° 0 °
Exam
Neg varus/valgus instability, L achmans and pivot shift; Bilateral tibias are mildly tender to palpation ; No medial/lateral joint line tenderness ; Pos. bilateral patellar grinds that reproduce symptoms Pos. tenderness to anterior aspect of knees with no obvious s welling or effusion present ; Neg. varus / valgus, a nterior and posterior cruciate ligament instability; Pos. pain with patellar grind b ilaterally ; Normal strength and reflexes bilaterally

The narrative summary (NARSUM) prepared 4 months prior to separation note d that the pain in his shins and knees was rated 2/10 , increasing to 5/10 with activity. Pertinent physical exam findings are summarized in the chart above. The orthopedic surgeon opined that, “when [the CI] is able to control his own activities, these symptoms should abate and h is prognosis for a full recovery is excellent. ” At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) evaluation ( a month post-separation) , the CI reported that he ha d “ intermittent pain that occurred about every two to three m onths. ” His pain would increase to a 6 /10 and last for one to two days. From a functional standpoint , he ha d increased pain with kneeling / squatting and was unable to run. Pertinent physical exam findings are summarized in the chart above.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB combined the bilateral knee and tibial conditions under a single disability rating, coded analogously to 5003. Although VASRD §4.71a permits combined ratings of two or more joints under 5003, it allows separate ratings for separately compensable joints. IAW DoDI 6040.44 the Board must follow suit if the PEB combined adjudication is not compliant with the latter stipulation, provided that each ‘unbundled’ condition can be reasonably justified as separately unfitting in order to remain eligible for service rating. If the members judge that separately ratable conditions are justified by performance based fitness criteria and indicated IAW VASRD §4.7 (higher of two evaluations), separate ratings are recommended; with the stipulation that the result may not be lower than the overall combined rating from the PEB. The Board’s initial charge in this case was therefore directed at determining if the PEB’s combined adjudication was justified in lieu of separate ratings. All members agreed that the tibial periostitis and the knee PFS conditions were associated with the same disability and fitness implications. An attempt to provide separate tibial and PFS ratings would, in fact, be confounded by VASRD §4.14 (avoidance of pyramiding); and, amendable to separate or bilateral ratings IAW VASRD §4.20 (analogous rating) permitting same when “the anatomical localization and symptomatology are closely analogous.” Therefore, the only relevant choice before the Board was whether the tibial/knee rating should be confined to a single bilateral rating as conferred by the PEB; or, separate right and left ratings as conferred by the VA (although the VA rated only the knees, not the tibial diagnosis).

As noted above, there are no unilateral distinctions with regards to clinical features or fitness considerations. Although it is somewhat speculative to conclude that the tibial/knee disability confined to a single knee would not have rendered the CI incapable of performing his MOS, it is reasonable to surmise that it was the overall effect of both knees which rendered him unfit. It is further noted that a §4.71a basis for individual rating is questionable, given the lack of compensable ROM limitation or clear documentation of the presence of painful motion. Members agreed that there was a paucity of evidence in support of a conclusion that each extremity was separately unfitting at the time of separation. The commander’s statement did not specify any condition as the cause of the duty limitations; and, there was a protracted period leading up to separation during which no clinical acuity for the lower extremity conditions was manifest. The tibial and knee diagnoses were most compatible with VASRD codes 5022 (periostitis) and 5024 (tenosynovitis), both of which default to rating criteria of 5003 (degenerative arthritis) as applied by the PEB. With the lack of compensable ROM limitation or incapacitating episodes, this yields a bilateral rating of 10% for 2 or more major joints. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the bilateral tibia/knee pain condition.

Lumbar Spine Condition. The CI complained of LBP that began shortly after he entered active duty in 1996, without a specific injury. He noted occasional bi-radicular pain, but had no motor symptoms or objective neurological findings. He was followed in PT and chiropractic, issued temporary profiles, and treated conservatively. Imaging in June 1999 revealed DDD at L5/S1 and degenerative facet changes at L4 to S1, without evidence of disc herniation or neural encroachment. Surgery was not recommended, and the CI was furthermore not considered a candidate for epidural steroid injections (ESI) due to the lack radiculopathy or imaging evidence of peripheral nerve impingement. The lumbar condition was included in the 1999 PEB proceedings which returned him to duty, and it was more clinically active than the tibial/knee condition during the interval prior to separation.

The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM
MEB 4 Mo s . Pre-Sep
 VA C&P 1 Mo. Post-Sep
Flexion (90 ° Normal)
18” from floor ( roughly 70⁰)
 85 °
Ext (0-30 ° )
20 °
 25 °
Combined (240 ° )
N/A
210 °
Comment
Non- tender to palpation; Mild paraspinal tenderness; Negative Trendelenburg; Non-antalgic gait. Sensation intact; No increased symptoms with axial load; Negative straight leg raise; Normal Deep Tendon Reflexes & Strength
Pos. Tenderness lower spine; Neg. straight Leg Raise; Normal Deep Tendon Reflexes and Strength
§4.71a Rating
 10%* 10%
* Painful motion IAW VASRD 4.59
The NARSUM prepared 4 months prior to separation note d that h is back pain was 8/10 with exacerbations to 10/10 with activity. Pertinent physical exam findings are de tailed in the chart above. At post-separation C&P exam a month later , the CI described h is pain as a constant dull ache of 5/10 with no radicular symptoms . He reported flare ups at least once every other week which increase d the pain to a 10 and last ed for approximately 10 minutes , although he was no longer using anti-inflammatory medication . From a functional standpoint , he reported o ccupational problems with heavy lifting. Pertinent physical exam findings are summarized in the chart above.
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence; noting that the CI was separated after a significant change in VASRD codes and criteria for the spine, compared to those applied by the PEB. IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s recommendation must be premised on the VASRD in effect; although, the same evidence of course remains probative to the Board’s recommendation under the applicable VASRD criteria. The PEB’s 10% rating for “characteristic pain on motion” under the older code 5295 (lumbosacral strain) was consistent with the VASRD applied, and a higher rating was not supported by the evidence. The VA’s 10% rating under the current §4.71a formula (as also applicable to the Board’s recommendation) is consistent with the ROM evidence from the C&P examination. The ROM evidence also remains within the 10% parameters of the current formula. There was no evidence of ratable peripheral nerve impairment or documentation of incapacitating episodes which would provide for additional or higher rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB rating for the lumbar spine condition; but, recommends rating under code 5242 (degenerative arthritis of the spine) IAW the VASRD in effect at separation.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy, DoDI 1332.39, and AR 40-501 for rating the unfitting conditions was operant in this case; and, they were adjudicated independently of those directives by the Board. In the matter of the bilateral tibial/knee condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the lumbar spine condition, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB rating of 10%; but stipulates a change of code to 5242 to comply with VASRD §4.71a in effect at separation. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation :

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Bilateral Tibia and Anterior Knee Pain 5099-5003 10%
Degenerative Disc Disease, Lumbar Spine 5242 10%
COMBINED
 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120831, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




         Physical Disability Board of Review


 SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB),


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for AR20130010334 (PD201201630)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability description without modification of the combined rating or recharachterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01332

    Original file (PD-2014-01332.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The bilateral stress fractures, characterized as “chronic bilateral leg pain” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “bilateral tibial stress fractures”as unfitting;each rated 10% for a combinedrating of 20%. Bilateral leg X-rays on 14 January 2009 noted chronic stress changes along both tibiae.At the MEB examination performed on 12 March 2009, 2 months prior to separation, the CI reported...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01511

    Original file (PD-2013-01511.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Right Femoral Shaft Stress Fracture Condition . The diagnoses were listed asright femoral shaft stress fracture; bilateral medial tibial plateau stress reactions; right second metatarsal stress reaction; and bilateral...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01736

    Original file (PD2012 01736.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the neurogenic claudication condition as unfitting, rated 20%(specified as a pre-existing condition with 0% deduction), applying criteria ofthe Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). In order to recommend a rating for the separate condition, however, the Board must be satisfied that the separately rated condition is reasonably justified as separately unfitting. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01100

    Original file (PD2012 01100.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted.The PEB adjudicated “bilateral foot and tibial pain”as a single unfitting condition, rated 0%,under criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated. Members first deliberated if the bilateral foot and bilateral tibial conditions were reasonably justified as separately unfitting. In the matter of the servicecombined bilateral tibial and bilateral foot conditions, the Board by a...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02790

    Original file (PD-2013-02790.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated patellofemoral pain, bilateral knee, rated 0% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy; and the left tibial stress fracture as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions (back, left hip and asthma) were determined to be not unfitting. The examiner noted tenderness over the left shin.At the VA C&P exam performed 2 months prior to...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00492

    Original file (PD2011-00492.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. Bilateral Lower Leg Condition. Service Treatment Record.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00176

    Original file (PD-2013-00176.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Service IPEB – Dated 20021122VA - Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Recurrent Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome (Shin Splints)5022-500310%Recurrent Bilateral Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome5022-52620%*Service Treatment Record(STR)Chronic Shin SplintsCategory IIGERDCategory IIIDuodenal Ulcer Disease73050%STRRecurrent UrolithiasisCategory IIIUrolithiasis75080%STRNo Additional MEB/PEB EntriesOther x 1STR Combined: 10%Combined: 0%Derived from VA Rating Decision...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00953

    Original file (PD 2012 00953.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated bilateral anterior knee pain syndrome as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy and recurrent stress fracture of right tibia as unfitting, rated 0% with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The MEB examiner referred to the exam results documented on the MEB DD Form 2808 which are summarized in the chart above.The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 8 days prior...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00882

    Original file (PD2012-00882.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    See attached/enclosed letter and VA records.” In the letter the CI cites his bilateral tibial stress fractures as well as a panic disorder and painful knees, back and hands. Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20031001 Condition Stress Fracture, Left Tibia Stress Fracture, Right Tibia Bursitis Left Hip Panic Disorder w/o Agoraphobia 0% X 1 / Not Service-Connected x 2 Combined: 50% Rating 10% 10% 10% 30%* Code 5022 5022 5019 9412 Exam 20030828 20030828 20030828 20030902 ANALYSIS...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02762

    Original file (PD-2013-02762.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    These were considered together as right and left lower leg conditions for determination of fitness. The Board agreed the left hip condition was mild.The records noted periods of both hip pain and no hip pain.Routine X-rays, bone scans of the hips revealed no pathology. The Board noted the report of the CI at the time of the NARSUM thatleft hip pain “radiated from the back.”After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence, the Board agreed that there was no preponderance of evidence...